From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 17:10:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FC710656D0 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Received: from qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042478FC16 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.76]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id LFmi1i0051eYJf8AEHAkrJ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:10:44 +0000 Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org ([24.8.232.202]) by omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id LHAj1i0244NgCEG01HAkJo; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:10:44 +0000 Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0BHAgoA027669; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:10:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) From: Ian Lepore To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <4E8FCE8E-DDCB-4B38-9BFD-2A67BF03D50F@samsco.org> References: <20120110213719.GA92799@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20120110224100.GB93082@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <201201111005.28610.jhb@freebsd.org> <20120111162944.GB2266@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <4E8FCE8E-DDCB-4B38-9BFD-2A67BF03D50F@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:10:42 -0700 Message-Id: <1326301842.2419.80.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: memory barriers in bus_dmamap_sync() ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:10:45 -0000 On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 09:59 -0700, Scott Long wrote: > > Where barriers _are_ needed is in interrupt handlers, and I can > discuss that if you're interested. > > Scott > I'd be interested in hearing about that (and in general I'm loving the details coming out in your explanations -- thanks!). -- Ian