Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 15:32:51 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Diane Bruce <db@db.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, gerald@FreeBSD.org, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [Patch] Proposal: USE_GNU89 switch Message-ID: <20090530203251.GB16918@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20090530150138.GA95470@night.db.net> References: <20090529123633.GM48776@hoeg.nl> <20090530140800.GR48776@hoeg.nl> <4A213F84.1000704@FreeBSD.org> <20090530142152.GS48776@hoeg.nl> <4A2142E1.7000607@FreeBSD.org> <20090530143443.GT48776@hoeg.nl> <20090530150138.GA95470@night.db.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:01:38AM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote: > By the time FreeBSD-9 is released clang support will be solid and all > ports will compile with clang as well as gcc. ooh, can I have unicorns, too? :-) Seriously, I'd like to see the potential to throw the switch, with the caveat that it will probably be a _long_ time before ports will work well with anything other than gcc. (Not that some of them work that well _with_ gcc; many of the port source files are ancient and choke on modern gcc implementations. We keep weeding them out ...) mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090530203251.GB16918>