Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 14:04:35 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: May 17th UP machine 'panic' Message-ID: <19980525140435.34553@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980525202320.10356A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>; from Michael Hancock on Mon, May 25, 1998 at 08:55:44PM %2B0900 References: <19980525122507.46281@follo.net> <Pine.SV4.3.95.980525202320.10356A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 25, 1998 at 08:55:44PM +0900, Michael Hancock wrote: > The argument should be p or curproc depending on whether or not an > appropriate proc p is defined. I suppose you could just search and replace > adding curproc, but that's ugly. We might have to bite the bullet and do > it sometime later. If the problem is only the amount of work with doing the actual, physical replacements, I can do that. I estimate it to less than 6 hours of work (that's approx 1 minute 12 seconds per entry :-) If the problem is deciding if this is the way to go, that's something I can't help much with - I don't know the interactions in this area well enough. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980525140435.34553>