Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Feb 1997 16:00:59 -0600 (CST)
From:      Jimbo Bahooli <moke@fools.ecpnet.com>
To:        Ben Black <black@gage.com>
Cc:        Walter Hafner <hafner@suncog13.forwiss.tu-muenchen.de>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: UltraSPARC and MicroSPARC vs Pentium Pro ?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.970213155936.685B-100000@fools.ecpnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <9702131713.AA25713@squid.gage.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> >BTW: A P-Pro 200 has an overall benchmark of 3.0 ... faster than a Ultra
> >143 or Indigo 2! I can't give you exact results since our P-Pro is
> >currently in San Jose (SPIE conference exhibit).
> >
> 
> a 200MHz P6 beats a 143MHz UltraSPARC?  amazing.  according to your  
> benchmarks, the 167MHz UltraSPARC beats the 200MHz P6.  how about numbers for  
> a 200MHz Ultra?
> 
> 
> 
> b3n
> 

Also includee a price/performance ratio for the 200MHz ultra when compared
to the 200MHz P6. I'm sure b3n would be interested in seeing that.






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970213155936.685B-100000>