From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 29 17:43:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30449725 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (smtp.citrix.com [66.165.176.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80E2A13F0 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:43:40 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,798,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="79261003" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2013 17:43:33 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:43:32 -0500 Message-ID: <5298D244.3070905@citrix.com> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:43:32 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karl Pielorz , Subject: Re: Xen Guests / NTP best practice? References: <960417385DD53D94B3E2DF1C@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <960417385DD53D94B3E2DF1C@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:43:42 -0000 On 29/11/13 16:23, Karl Pielorz wrote: > > Hi, > > We have a number of FreeBSD 9.x boxes now running under XenServer 6.2 > > Does anyone have any info / best practice / guides for what's best to > use NTP / time sync wise? > > I've noticed that NTP isn't "overly happy" on some of these hosts (i.e. > it doesn't seem to settle on some, or will run for a while - then de-sync). > > We have two local NTP servers (not virtualized) - should we be getting > the guest to sync? - Can Xen keep the clock in sync for us (Xen itself > is pointed at the two ntp servers) - or are there any options / configs > we should consider using with NTP to keep time sync'd up? There have been some improvements in 10 regarding timekeeping, now FreeBSD makes use of the PV timer and PV clock when running under HVM, which should be more stable. Could you try if your issues with ntp are reproducible on 10? Roger.