Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 06:26:18 -0600 From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: Richard B Mahoney <rbm49@it.canterbury.ac.nz> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ghostscript-6.50_2 under 4.0 Stable Message-ID: <14987.51946.477527.628338@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <20010215160546.H6617@student.canterbury.ac.nz> References: <20010215124000.G6617@student.canterbury.ac.nz> <200102150138.f1F1cXc45591@explorer.rsa.com> <20010215160546.H6617@student.canterbury.ac.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Richard B Mahoney <rbm49@student.canterbury.ac.nz> types: > > This is the first time I've updated, but I would have though that > the update available from, > > ftp://releng4.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/ \ > 4.2-20010211-STABLE/ > > was the most recent ports skeleton available. Am I wrong? Will I > now have to cvsup my ports? From the looks of the messages in the thread, you updated your ports tree in such a way as to leave old patch files still in the tree. If that's they case, you need to rm -rf the ports tree and put in a new one. If you've still got the update you downloaded, you can use that. I would recommend doing a cvsup to get them, as that allows you to use cvsup to get just the changes to the tree. <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14987.51946.477527.628338>