From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 21:58:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD396CFA094 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 21:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D631102; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 21:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id v25LwbfX084978; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 13:58:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id v25Lwbu9084977; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 13:58:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201703052158.v25Lwbu9084977@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: svn commit: r314693 - head/usr.sbin/rmt In-Reply-To: <957a873a-cf20-5a2a-638a-c6f7c154bf84@FreeBSD.org> To: Bryan Drewery Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 13:58:37 -0800 (PST) CC: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 22:44:02 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 21:58:39 -0000 ... > > Let me review my other 10 or so pending commits again, but I think all > > of those are errors in SYMLINKS=. Bapt did not answer my question > > on how to deal with SYMLINKS hardcoded to use INSTALL_SYMLINKS but > > I well need it to use INSTALL_RSYMLINKS for some of these corrections. > > > > For now I have just feed the proper arguments to SYMLINKS so that it > > creates proper relative paths. Both bapt and yourself have not responded to how I should deal with the issue of relativie link paths needed in SYMLINKS= so I am going forward with my pathces as they are, this at least gets a distrubution built without any absolute links again, something that hasnt happened since 1995. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org