Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Sep 1997 00:02:35 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        dg@root.com
Cc:        tlambert@primenet.com, ccsanady@bob.scl.ameslab.gov, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: TCP timers (Was: Re: new timeout routines)
Message-ID:  <199709260002.RAA12137@usr04.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <199709252303.QAA17051@implode.root.com> from "David Greenman" at Sep 25, 97 04:03:57 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >This will increase the load on the timer code with a lot of 20 tick
> >timers for a 100Hz softclock.
> 
>    "A lot"? There will be exactly _one_. This is not a problem. Please read
> again what I wrote and tell me how I was unclear so that I don't make the
> same mistake in the future.

It was unclear that there would not be one per FIN_2_WAIT per socket;
how do you plan to handle these timeouts to give one timer entry?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709260002.RAA12137>