Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:55:49 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Alternatives to rsync Message-ID: <f20a384a-ebcd-dc5a-0af3-1689967d7d7e@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20161016224631.GK20041@eureka.lemis.com> References: <0F5C36816EB64D09B42932E21FBC6269@RIVENDELL> <F48A11DD9CAE468084DB17A1E582F78F@RIVENDELL> <20161016224631.GK20041@eureka.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 17.10.2016 um 00:46 schrieb Greg 'groggy' Lehey: > On Friday, 14 October 2016 at 8:01:51 +0300, reko.turja--- via freebsd= -ports wrote: >> Greg, I've actually put some thought in making a local port of >> rsync2. I've done some research on it and it seems to be fairly >> usable and security patched still. > Even simpler, use the old version of the current rsync port. Check > out with svn, which (svn log) can also tell you when the last rsync 2 > version was. How many unfixed and critical/security bugs will that bring back?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f20a384a-ebcd-dc5a-0af3-1689967d7d7e>