From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Feb 26 00:24:53 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA25348
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 00:24:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.6])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA25341
          for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 00:24:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
          by dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id CAA09583; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 02:24:18 -0600 (CST)
Received: from wck-ca5-07.ix.netcom.com(199.35.213.167) by dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
	id sma009569; Wed Feb 26 02:24:17 1997
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.9) id AAA04625; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 00:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 00:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199702260824.AAA04625@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: adam@veda.is
CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199702260401.EAA07468@veda.is> (message from Adam David on Wed, 26 Feb 1997 04:01:45 GMT)
Subject: Re: __FreeBSD_version
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * >+#if __FreeBSD_version > 199607

 * ucd-snmp is currently broken, perhaps this is the reason for the breakage.

I don't think so.  The issue is whether the above was intended to
include 2.1.6 or 2.1.7.  For 2.2 and -current, it makes no difference.

 * The port is also seriously out of date and on my update list if Gary doesn't
 * get there first.

That would be very appreciated.

Satoshi