From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 16:01:13 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C1C16A417 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:01:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143FB13C465 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:01:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so197474nfb for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Xnwx8aASipAd7bCpOMBFjhUu3jREtzX1RTIXT7UbRCvdMjaa0yxBbkEahUkAoXKGrHNUwUJy1xD3hfk3ltse13awQzM2itd0Fdn9TO4S3uuvFUlB0Z1dPzysgvCj3rK3qR38UCpiqpt4DK3r7Tc83ZRvAU0pPqGIRRfhJFmQhi8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=B5IRyop50/MDH4ibcIigAbyQLlU2AOOh54OiO5BdnrDcvj2D52iqUo9GwOCAZpRtnijGS67nb3n3LaeMd0qdria1y4HyWXbpGPH1gkUawFwagsuJj/By85c9fL3XG4mtSugSjLFvC6G+dt5ySyfAb1uOHdYfBPkYyPlx9p8Fuxs= Received: by 10.78.37.7 with SMTP id k7mr445893huk.1188403271491; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fairy.alashan.de ( [79.196.60.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 35sm6246906huc.2007.08.29.09.01.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46D5B46D.5010202@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:01:17 +0000 From: Christian Walther User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070826) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Butcher References: <46D4EFFF.5080807@fusiongol.com> In-Reply-To: <46D4EFFF.5080807@fusiongol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Encrypted zfs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:01:13 -0000 Nathan Butcher wrote: > Yep, using GELI the providers is much better. > > I decided to go one step further and run GLABEL on my drives so my ZFS > pool will be immune from device enumeration issues (assuming I move the > drives between systems, SATA raid cards, etc.) > [...] AFAIK zfs is immune against device enumeration issues itself. There is a nice video on YouTube showing Sun engineers setting up a ZFS pool on a bunch of USB sticks. Afterwards they remove all of them, shuffle them, and put them back in. No problem. (It's in german and a translation is still missing. But the talk is stupid anyway, and the acting of the engineers, too.) This works on FreeBSD, too. I moved one of my disks to another controller. ZFS recognised it on reboot. Really nice. :-)