From owner-freebsd-security Mon May 31 10:37:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from narcissus.net (narcissus.net [209.73.230.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5788515691 for ; Mon, 31 May 1999 10:37:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@narcissus.net) Received: by narcissus.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED630194; Mon, 31 May 1999 13:28:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by narcissus.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E0AD318B; Mon, 31 May 1999 13:28:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 13:28:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Snob Art Genre To: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: auditors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 31 May 1999, Ilmar S. Habibulin wrote: > On Mon, 31 May 1999, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > > The auditing project has been dead/sleeping for a *long* while. If it > > should be revived, the first thing to do would be to merge over the > > OpenBSD fixes, and then have somebody actually *lead* the auditing > > project. > > And what about posix auditing? Robert Watson made posix.1e audit > implementation for freebsd. Why do not use his work? Different kind of auditing. The first is people vetting code for security flaws, the second is logging of system events. Ben @narcissus.net -- finally To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message