From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct  7 22:57:06 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20CF106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  7 Oct 2012 22:57:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com)
Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com
	[69.62.255.118])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9105B8FC08
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  7 Oct 2012 22:57:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AB250840
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  7 Oct 2012 15:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20121007234043.cadf5863.freebsd@edvax.de>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:57:05 -0700
Message-ID: <15439.1349650625@tristatelogic.com>
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
Subject: Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 22:57:06 -0000


In message <20121007234043.cadf5863.freebsd@edvax.de>, 
Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:

>A workaround (and not directly the answer to your question) is
>to process the config dialogs before starting the build:
>
>	# make config-recursive
>
>Once set, the options won't be requested on a second run.

Hey! Wow!  Thanks!  That will work for me.

Needless to say, I didn't know about that Makefile target, until now.