From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Oct 31 19:41: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E7537B4FE; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:40:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from billy-club.village.org (billy-club.village.org [10.0.0.3]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eA13eun27426; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 20:40:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@billy-club.village.org) Received: from billy-club.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by billy-club.village.org (8.11.1/8.8.3) with ESMTP id eA13fCV42009; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 20:41:12 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200011010341.eA13fCV42009@billy-club.village.org> To: obrien@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Like to commit my diskprep Cc: arch@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:29:46 PST." <20001031132945.B28476@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20001031132945.B28476@dragon.nuxi.com> <200010311747.KAA80353@harmony.village.org> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 20:41:11 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20001031132945.B28476@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : Since Matt's bits do fix the basic problem, is diskprep OBE except maybe : as a wrapper for fdisk & disklabel? But Matt is unwilling to bring them into current, so they are not a contender as far as I'm concerned. I don't care how wonderful they are. Without someone willing to champion them into -current they don't exist as far as I'm concerned. They also violate the disk layering that we need to maintain as we move to new platforms. Also, diskprep allows one to "mass produce" disks in such a way that you have the same partitioning on all of them, except maybe one "hog" slice that picks up the extra bits that different geometries might require. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message