From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  1 23:58:06 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBBC106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  1 Apr 2011 23:58:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from christopher-ml@telting.org)
Received: from mail.telting.org (mail.telting.org [204.109.56.249])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE928FC0C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  1 Apr 2011 23:58:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.local (cpe-76-168-204-255.socal.res.rr.com
	[76.168.204.255])
	by mail.telting.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFFD2AA7D
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  1 Apr 2011 23:58:05 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4D96668C.3090406@telting.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:58:04 -0700
From: Chris Telting <christopher-ml@telting.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110305 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Port dependencies
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 23:58:06 -0000


Just in a thoughtful mood and thought I'd to the question to the cloud.

One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell.  
Ports link against so my optional components and pull them into the 
install.  Libraries and components are built based on make file 
defines.  But this doesn't have to be so.  It's possible and easy enough 
to check a running system for which libraries are installed and only if 
a feature is enabled to load the library.  The number of console 
programs that want to pull in X window or kde is my boggling.  Knowing 
how to program myself when I see a "make config" menu on every single 
port it makes me want to cry.  I think the "make config" menus should 
have everything checked by default and only be provided to prevent 
things from being compiled such as for embedded devices.

My question is why is this so?  Why can't programs do more run time 
configuration?  Is a configuration run time system library needed to 
make it easier?

Chris