From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb  5 18:25:08 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF6145B
 for <freebsd-office@freebsd.org>; Tue,  5 Feb 2013 18:25:08 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD06E82;
 Tue,  5 Feb 2013 18:25:08 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <51114E27.3020408@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:23:35 -0500
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130128 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
Subject: Re: libreoffice 3.6.5 update fail, 9-STABLE amd64 (with gcc47 works)
References: <1360066236929-5784049.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <51114827.5020802@FreeBSD.org> <1360087852246-5784150.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1360087852246-5784150.post@n5.nabble.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-office@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD <freebsd-office.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-office>,
 <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-office>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-office@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office>,
 <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:25:08 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2013-02-05 13:10:52 -0500, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Thanks for reply!
> 
> Yes, mixing is my fault, albeit I was usually not bitten by it with
> *office, I cannot rebuilt with base gcc, as I do not have one, but
> I assume clang should be just fine, as it links against base
> libstdc++?

Yes, it'll work, too.

> requested output:
> 
> $ ldd /usr/local/lib/libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4 
> /usr/local/lib/libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4: libclucene-shared.so.1
> => /usr/local/lib/libclucene-shared.so.1 (0x801397000) libz.so.6 =>
> /lib/libz.so.6 (0x8015b6000) libstdc++.so.6 =>
> /usr/local/lib/gcc47/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8017cb000) libm.so.5 =>
> /lib/libm.so.5 (0x801ad3000) libgcc_s.so.1 =>
> /usr/local/lib/gcc47/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x801cf2000) libthr.so.3 =>
> /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801f07000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7
> (0x80081c000)

Yup, it was definitely built with gcc47/libstdc++.so.6.

> $ objdump -p /usr/local/lib/libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4
> 
> <snip>

Actually, I wanted to see something there, i.e., RPATH.  Anyway, I got
the answer I was looking for. :-)

Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJREU4mAAoJECXpabHZMqHOmlkH/RUTlsOLjxvRX6DtnqNDeqdJ
GQVc7fRyymxe9sPdWzMWkzdotrbyQ/DSxKdm1S+JkmxIhOlT7s3W5xg3Bm4Lrw1J
4yS83ga/ZXFBT33C5P3gPOe9FdXSQAO25N9wVbQdZxw5khopAujoK1MSz6Xsv2bD
0G6TVpFVsCzA5Svi0hnjOs78GZKG6WkuZPmBQ+5VgbBM11gXE4ATHvrSyQZEmSCq
ERE6B3f23wfYQGN7J0XwGGy+srgLtkr1x3pODL/7MUmdQQIufmBFtFUo3Ex1zUsG
7uzwtLQL1gAr+4Q7dMkykdycoj9GX/SX46LcVnG6hsrreY3VHQCD7uAZoXCEOBk=
=wpm8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----