From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Oct  1 04:39:05 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA13529
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 1 Oct 1996 04:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA13524;
          Tue, 1 Oct 1996 04:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA15889; Tue, 1 Oct 1996 04:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
cc: bde@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Your UserConfig changes for unmasking PCI devices... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 01 Oct 1996 21:02:54 +0930."
             <199610011132.VAA11670@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> 
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 1996 04:38:49 -0700
Message-ID: <15887.844169929@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Ah, how about putting off calling userconfig() until after the PCI and
> EISA probes?  Since it's only _really_ relevant to the ISA probe
> process, shouldn't it be directly associated with it?

If this doesn't have any unwonted side-effects, sure!

						Jordan