From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 09:04:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id B871837B404; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE5637B401; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7F243F3F; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:04:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h39G41D0043395; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:04:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h39G41Ph043394; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:04:01 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20030409160401.GA43342@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200304072336.h37Na3xa048094@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Perforce Change Reviews cc: Peter Wemm Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 28461 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 16:04:07 -0000 On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:23:56AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 07-Apr-2003 Peter Wemm wrote: > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=28461 > > > > Change 28461 by peter@peter_daintree on 2003/04/07 16:35:32 > > > > use -mcmodel=medium for hammer. Otherwise it generates > > 32 bit instructions for things like invltlb(). kernel model > > comes later. > > Side topic: are we going to call it amd64 some day instead of x86-64? This gets hairy... if the toolchain calls it one thing and we call it another. AMD marketing is trying to squash the "x86-64" name in favaor of "AMD64". Note that "AMD64" is what M$ has always called it... so one has to wonder...