Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 14:00:37 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Fritz Heinrichmeyer <Fritz.Heinrichmeyer@Fernuni-Hagen.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: samba 3.0 for production use? Message-ID: <200311241400.41417.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <1069676745.23328.2.camel@jfh00.fernuni-hagen.de> References: <1069676745.23328.2.camel@jfh00.fernuni-hagen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_5Dgw/xVQydW9epU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 24 November 2003 13:25, Fritz Heinrichmeyer wrote: > Hello, > Is samba 3.0 still not ready for production use with freebsd (it is > still marked as -devel port)? The "-devel" suffix does not really 'mark' anything. It used to be a=20 development snapshot until the recent 3.0.0 release and nobody bothered to= =20 change the name. http://de.samba.org/samba/devel/ still deems 2.2 as the=20 recommended, "current stable release, suitable for use in production=20 environments". I guess you'll need to evaluate by yourself, how suitable=20 samba 3.0.0 really is for your production enviroment. I myself do like its= =20 UNICODE support/charset conversion features very much. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_5Dgw/xVQydW9epU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/wgD5Xhc68WspdLARAofXAJ4rXbuHhADWjpANQ+rIZIiukverVQCggFCh PycXF0thRb510MECbzpsnd4= =Z7b/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_5Dgw/xVQydW9epU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311241400.41417.michaelnottebrock>