Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 21:34:33 +0800 From: blubee blubeeme <gurenchan@gmail.com> To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless) Message-ID: <CALM2mE=N=uwm4k6Ux-KUG0FyQ4KZqy0z9VyEyewf-57Snap%2Buw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20171207131444.GA36791@c720-r314251> References: <CAGBxaXmwzXqZXSKX4-_qe15L3Xa8bVx%2BsFnFrxoksY8Ka3gS3w@mail.gmail.com> <865f71f7-5d2d-90fd-8b41-c00d2317d083@rlwinm.de> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712070916370.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> <04c3f524-b594-078b-f28c-597c4da595e8@rlwinm.de> <CAGwOe2aFg9yF%2B1tEgV1quDAsd1XV9fMNuzG_aFE6uiW=-7GU8w@mail.gmail.com> <indi-1zk3-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20171207131444.GA36791@c720-r314251>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From my experience poudriere doesn't support that workflow. Either build the port and create a package of it, then install that on your target machine or build everything in your laptop. Poudriere wants to be the build bot. On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote: > El d=C3=ADa jueves, diciembre 07, 2017 a las 01:40:28p. m. +0100, Jan Bei= ch > escribi=C3=B3: > > > Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > Can poudriere prefetch packages too? > > > > No until https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/issues/319 is fixed. > > I have a question which points in some similar direction: I have built > my ports with poudriere, which results in some 2000 packages. I copy over > this repos to my other laptops and netbooks for installation. In > addition I have on the target laptops the exact same SVN revision of > /usr/ports as in the poudriere jail where the packages have been built. > All fine until here. > > Sometimes I want to add some port which was not built with poudriere > directly compiling it on the target laptops and now, ofc, this > compilation is missing some other packages the concrete port is > depending on and it tries to build them too, even if they are already as > built package in my local repo. If I'm not lazy, I watch the building > and when it goes to look in Internet for some additional source to > build, I interrupt the 'make install' and look if I could install it from > the local repo. Boring. Can I direct the make process to look on the > flight into the local repo to satisfy the needs of the compilation of > the port? > > matthias > -- > Matthias Apitz, =E2=9C=89 guru@unixarea.de, =E2=8C=82 http://www.unixarea= .de/ =F0=9F=93=B1 > +49-176-38902045 > Public GnuPG key: http://www.unixarea.de/key.pub >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALM2mE=N=uwm4k6Ux-KUG0FyQ4KZqy0z9VyEyewf-57Snap%2Buw>