Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 15:04:33 -0500 From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org> To: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: has anyone attempted the ASUS "Tinker Board" ? Message-ID: <50b5ed8a-7218-2739-fa76-0b2025817b56@blastwave.org> In-Reply-To: <20181202205057.1e91cb6d89f4d045c3350354@bidouilliste.com> References: <ea6a857b-1409-c967-5645-9f9ea2031f86@blastwave.org> <20181202205057.1e91cb6d89f4d045c3350354@bidouilliste.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/2/18 2:50 PM, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > Hi Dennis, > > On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 14:34:38 -0500 > Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org> wrote: > >> >> Merely curious. I would like to update the Wikipedia article with a >> paragraph about FreeBSD 12.0 ( RC or whatever ) but think I should ask >> before going into spin dry test mode with a board that someone else may >> have already discarded as "nope". >> >> Dennis >> >> ps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asus_Tinker_Board >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > IIRC the clocks looks like the one in the RK3328 (The SoC in the > Rock64) so it may be easy to make a driver. > I personnaly don't plan to work on this board but if someone wants too > I'll happily review some patches. > Thank you for the feedback. I have one of those units on my desk. So for the moment I will stick at post-it note on it that says "needs FreeBSD work" as no one may have tried anything with it. Yet. You think perhaps the only tweak required is related to clock chips? Dennis
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50b5ed8a-7218-2739-fa76-0b2025817b56>