From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 09:08:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 70BB637B404; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:08:40 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067C337B401; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:08:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A1F43FB1; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:08:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from arr@watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h39G8wYX027161; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:08:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from arr@watson.org) Received: from localhost (arr@localhost)h39G8vfG027158; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:08:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: arr owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:08:57 -0400 (EDT) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" To: "David O'Brien" In-Reply-To: <20030409160401.GA43342@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: <20030409120732.O26090@fledge.watson.org> References: <200304072336.h37Na3xa048094@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030409160401.GA43342@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Perforce Change Reviews cc: Peter Wemm cc: John Baldwin Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 28461 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 16:08:41 -0000 On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, David O'Brien wrote: :On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:23:56AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: :> :> On 07-Apr-2003 Peter Wemm wrote: :> > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=28461 :> > :> > Change 28461 by peter@peter_daintree on 2003/04/07 16:35:32 :> > :> > use -mcmodel=medium for hammer. Otherwise it generates :> > 32 bit instructions for things like invltlb(). kernel model :> > comes later. :> :> Side topic: are we going to call it amd64 some day instead of x86-64? : :This gets hairy... if the toolchain calls it one thing and we call it :another. AMD marketing is trying to squash the "x86-64" name in favaor :of "AMD64". Note that "AMD64" is what M$ has always called it... so one :has to wonder... http://news.com.com/2008-1082-995885.html mentions about AMD receiving a warmer welcome from M$ than they (AMD) initially thought they were going to get (atleast wrt opteron) Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org