From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jun 28 11:50:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA21029 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 28 Jun 1996 11:50:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA21024 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 1996 11:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA08257; Fri, 28 Jun 1996 11:48:32 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199606281848.LAA08257@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: [Q] Can I run SCO binaries on FreeBSD-2.1.0? To: weldon@excelsus.com (Weldon S Godfrey 3) Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 11:48:32 -0700 (MST) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Weldon S Godfrey 3" at Jun 28, 96 07:39:49 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > On this note, has anyone used the APC PowerChute shoftware sucessfully on > FreeBSD, in particular the SCO version (of course). Not likely. Aliens wrote our SIO code. The powerchute code depends on using the partial open hack to get the modem control port open nd in a state where reads and writes work, with DCD not present, then it sepends templating behaviour for port defaults (which we can sort of do using rc.local) and it sepends on bit 8 indicating modem control vs. non-modem control for uppercase vs. lowercase port association, since the lock files have to lock both ports, even though they have different names. Finally, it depends on SCO-style instead of POSIX-style (which we get wrong, IMO) processing of SIGHUP and controlling TTY assignment. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.