From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Oct 4 17:43: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F38237B66C for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 17:42:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubble.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca42-27.ix.netcom.com [209.111.212.27]) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA07366; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 20:42:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by bubble.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.8.8) id RAA04450; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 17:42:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami) To: Brandon Fosdick Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports layout/Combine DESCR and COMMENT Results? References: <39DBA90F.71E94B5F@glue.umd.edu> From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 04 Oct 2000 17:42:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: Brandon Fosdick's message of "Wed, 04 Oct 2000 18:02:55 -0400" Message-ID: Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Brandon Fosdick * I'm getting ready to submit a few new ports. In all of the discussion * I've lost track of the what and when of what's actually being * implemented. The last I heard new ports should have the COMMENT line * moved to the Makefile and pkg/DESCR in the port's base directory * regardless of all of the other changes mentioned. Is this still the * case? What's the effective date for this change? If its soon I'll just * hold off on these submissions. The big move will be done this weekend, but it doesn't include the COMMENT -> Makefile change. Anyway, why don't you just submit the port using the new format so someone can commit it early next week. :) You can try out the new format early by defining NEWLAYOUT when you call make. Make sure you have the latest bsd.port.mk. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message