From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 17 07:03:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA13881 for current-outgoing; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 07:03:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from shrimp.dataplex.net (shrimp.dataplex.net [208.2.87.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA13874 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 07:03:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [208.2.87.4] (cod.dataplex.net [208.2.87.4]) by shrimp.dataplex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA08096; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 09:03:26 -0600 (CST) X-Sender: rkw@shrimp.dataplex.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199703171406.PAA04521@ravenock.cybercity.dk> References: from Richard Wackerbarth at "Mar 17, 97 06:28:24 am" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 09:03:31 -0600 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=AFren?= Schmidt From: Richard Wackerbarth Subject: Re: Which lists for discussion. Cc: current@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by freefall.freebsd.org id HAA13876 Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk S¯ren Schmidt said: >Well, actually it is quite easy: > > 2.1.X dead That's what they said about 2.1.5 :-) > 2.2.X stable Only AFTER it has "proven" itself. > 3.x.x current > >Thats it, like it or not :) That's your (narrow) view.