From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 3 0:29:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE7F37BFF2 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 00:29:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA03771; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 09:29:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Bosko Milekic Cc: David Greenman , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 Jul 2000 02:03:27 EDT." Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 09:29:37 +0200 Message-ID: <3769.962609377@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Bosko Milekic writes: > I'm getting the unfortunate impression that evolution is being > frowned upon here. Are their other people that frown the proposal out > there to this extent? (i.e. "don't change it if it works") I'd like to > hear some important voices on this issue so that I can decide whether to > just drop this entire thing and forget about it. (in other words, what do > committers and/or core have to say about this?) If you can improve it, and show it to be improved, I think it is a good idea. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message