Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:38:59 -0400 From: "Moti Levy" <moti@flncs.com> To: "Tim Radigan" <tradigan@touchdynamic.com>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ipfiltering and ppoe question Message-ID: <012701c27471$c0f95f50$fd6e34c6@moti> References: <3DAC4FFE.9040001@touchdynamic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
you should use all your rules using tun0 and not the rl1 interface . there's a good reading here http://www.realo.ca/BSDinstall.html ------------------------------------------------- Moti www.flncs.com ------------------------------------------------- be careful what you wish for ... ------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Radigan" <tradigan@touchdynamic.com> To: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:27 PM Subject: ipfiltering and ppoe question > hi people.. i have question regarding ipfiltering and pppoe.. > > here at the office we have a pppoe connection.. i'm using ipfiltering to > block packets, etc.. now.. my question.. > > when ppp connects via pppoe, my nic (rl1) is not assigned an external ip > address.. however, the tun0 interface is.. when i'm designing my > ipf.rules file, should i set the rules to block and/or pass on rl1, or > the tun0 interface? > > same goes for my ipnat.rules file.. should i map the rl1 interface or > the tun0 interface? > > any help would be appreciated.. > > Tim Radigan @ Touch Dynamic > http://www.touchdynamic.com > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?012701c27471$c0f95f50$fd6e34c6>