From owner-freebsd-java Sat Sep 25 19:20:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573B614C2B; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 19:20:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: (from eischen@localhost) by pcnet1.pcnet.com (8.8.7/PCNet) id WAA22154; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 22:19:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 22:19:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen Message-Id: <199909260219.WAA22154@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: eischen@vigrid.com, mi@aldan.algebra.com Subject: Re: porting libjava to FreeBSD Cc: java@FreeBSD.org, jb@cimlogic.com.au, jdp@polstra.com, obrien@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Well, for one, this is a FreeBSD's limitation, not advantage, IMO. And > secondly, libjava folks obviously don't know that... BTW, any plans > on kernel-threading? So that two threads do run on two CPUs, if > available?.. It's being worked on, but don't count on anything soon. > =I would make a freebsd_threads.c and use other models as examples. > =Remember that FreeBSD threads are user threads, and some of the things > =the Linux thread support does, we don't have to. I don't know that > =Linux threads is a good model to use because of this. > > Can one of the gurus, please, step out and make it then? Thank you... I don't know about anyone else, but I don't have the time. I can answer questions, though. Dan Eischen eischen@vigrid.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message