Date: 29 Aug 1998 10:38:19 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: dima@best.net, dillon@backplane.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make.conf Message-ID: <xzpzpcouqro.fsf@grjottunagard.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Mike Smith's message of "Fri, 28 Aug 1998 22:16:48 %2B0000" References: <199808282216.WAA00640@word.smith.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> writes: > In the following scenario, it requires an audit as Matt mentioned: > > - You perform an operating system upgrade, which updates /etc/rc.conf > - The upgrade adds a new service to the standard system startup > - The update of /etc/rc.conf enables this new service > - You do not want this new service enabled It doesn't make a difference; it requires an audit even if you don't have rc.conf.local. I have been using the rc.conf.local scheme since the sysconfig --> rc.conf switch, and I find that 'diff -u /etc/rc.conf /usr/src/etc/rc.conf' tells me all I need to know. Then again, being a committer, I usually know what changes to expect... DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpzpcouqro.fsf>