From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Oct 10 12:00:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA16000 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 12:00:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA15979 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 12:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id MAA27219; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 12:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 12:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199810101900.MAA27219@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: Stefan Eggers Subject: Re: ports/8253: vim4: vim -g (on ELF w/o Motif) doesn't find Xaw w/o help Reply-To: Stefan Eggers Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/8253; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Stefan Eggers To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: seggers@semyam.dinoco.de Subject: Re: ports/8253: vim4: vim -g (on ELF w/o Motif) doesn't find Xaw w/o help Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 20:51:56 +0200 Hi! I now know why it failed on my machine. I had an old /etc/rc which didn't set the ELF ldconfig path. Now that this gets set "vim -g" works as expected. As far as I remember the mails on -current it was supposed to have the library search path in the executable and that made me file a bug report. Now the questions is how this shall work on an ELF system. With library search path (overrideable by LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or shall vim4 be solely relying on ldconfig information? Stefan. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message