Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Sep 1997 16:33:46 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
Cc:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Eivind Eklund <eivind@bitbox.follo.net>, Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>, Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: How do I check out a snapshot?
Message-ID:  <199709272233.QAA27878@rocky.mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <l03110701b05318734355@[208.2.87.4]>
References:  <19970927191524.23340@bitbox.follo.net> <199709271529.RAA11811@bitbox.follo.net> <Pine.BSF.3.96.970928011026.313D-100000@Journey2.mat.net> <199709271930.NAA27312@rocky.mt.sri.com> <l03110701b05318734355@[208.2.87.4]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >All files are modified when tags are put down, so it means CTM deltas
> >and CVS deltas are rather large, although the change for each file is
> >rather small.
> 
> A suggestion to consider. --
> 
> Suppose that the snapshots are always generated by using a CVS checkout
> that never references the head directly. In other words, in a manner
> that others can reproduce at a later time. (For example, a checkout
> by date, using yesterday's date)

Except that means lots more work for the release engineer.  The RE has
enough problems just making a release, making sure that the code is
'synchronized' to a certain date would make it that much harder.  I
think it would be 'easier' to simply tag the tree.



Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709272233.QAA27878>