Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 May 2020 13:13:09 +0100
From:      Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org>
To:        Tomasz CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info>, byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: debian in bhyve on freebsd
Message-ID:  <8427ea0d-339d-de66-814c-d0ac3ce1e7ed@qeng-ho.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAM8r67B5gC98PW%2BLk9%2BsboHO_RJS%2BW7YMy7o9=g54j6ojd348Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <60e7d910e1eb13643ee3c60080e96766.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> <313b2342-acc4-37ac-f5c9-a2f2cbc80d0d@pinyon.org> <a460d1c5ebb83f7d1d5d4eea2423e088.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> <CAM8r67B5gC98PW%2BLk9%2BsboHO_RJS%2BW7YMy7o9=g54j6ojd348Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22/05/2020 17:29, Tomasz CEDRO wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 6:25 PM James B. Byrne via freebsd-questions wrote:
>> The problem was with bhyve. Well, with me really, bhyve is innocent. I
>> neglected to run 'vm switch create public && vm switch add public igb0'. So
>> there was no virtual network for the guests to connect to.
> 
> I also found first contact with bhyve a bit complicated and confusing.
> Maybe creating a simple GUI like VirtualBox already has would be
> beneficial to the users? :-)
> 

The sysutils/vm-bhyve port (which James obviously has) is command line
only but I find it very useful at taming bhyve's complexity.

-- 
Fat Earther: One who believes the world is round but has put on too
much weight round the middle.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8427ea0d-339d-de66-814c-d0ac3ce1e7ed>