From owner-cvs-all Wed Apr 11 22:51:41 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-64-173-15-98.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.173.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F57A37B507; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:51:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f3C5pL893053; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:51:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: rwatson@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net, nik@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/examples/cvsup standard-supfile In-Reply-To: References: <200104120506.WAA40897@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010411225121L.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:51:21 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 11 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I still think all this contraversy could be avoided if we simply nuked the *-supfiles and replaced them with a simple Q&A script which configured the target cvsupfile after asking the user some questions. /usr/ports/net/cvsupit/pkg-install wouldn't be a bad place to start, with some small tweaks to include the new and upcoming "release branch" and perhaps give the user a bit more background information on the options they're chosing. I have meetings for the rest of the week or I'd do it myself. :( - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message