Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:33:20 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Costello <chris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: Merging fdescfs. Message-ID: <XFMail.011011143320.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20011011160750.D696@holly.calldei.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11-Oct-01 Chris Costello wrote: > There is at least one longstanding bug in the -STABLE > implementation of fdescfs at this point, and since the -CURRENT > code has been around for quite some time now, has had adequate > testing time, and is generally cleaner than the original code, > I'm all for merging the entire thing into -STABLE now that > 4.4-RELEASE has past. I'm not entirely sure, however, if POLA is > a real problem in this case since so obviously few people use it, > and I'd like your feedback as to whether it is or isn't. What are the changes that are visible to the user in the new fdescfs versus the old one? -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.011011143320.jhb>