Date: Fri, 11 Aug 1995 10:57:36 +0200 From: "Julian Stacey <jhs@freebsd.org>" <jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> To: Mark Hittinger <bugs@ns1.win.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: majordomo absence Message-ID: <199508110857.KAA03923@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Aug 1995 16:26:30 %2B0200." <199508101426.KAA22610@ns1.win.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > We have majordomo as a freefall facility, > > but it's not in ports ? > > Is it merely waiting for somebody like me to open his mouth > > & volunteer / be volunteered ;-) > > > > One consideration might be the 1.93 version license terms. I have the > 1.92 version prior to that license and use that instead. Well, I'd like to use majordomo for some smallish non freebsd lists here, so a copy in ports would be useful, do you have a port that's commit-worthy ? I have majordomo-1.93.tar.gz & associated files from ftp.greatcircle.com/pub/majordomo (not unpacked yet) I know nothing of 1.92 versus 1.93 license terms, should we stick at 1.92 ? if so can I grab a copy from you direct, via freefall incoming, or the net ? I recall (Rod ?) saying long ago we had a customised majordomo on freefall ? Julian S
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508110857.KAA03923>