Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 08:03:57 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: place for new ports Message-ID: <199607300603.IAA09960@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199607292227.PAA00979@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from Satoshi Asami at "Jul 29, 96 03:27:45 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Satoshi Asami wrote: > * Yes, that's another good idea, maybe better than mine so far. Would let > * me know where they came from, and using GNATS might cut down the noise > * factor some even. > > We even have a category of our own "ports", shouldn't that coupled > with "change-request" be enough? Btw., i noticed that several submissions came with explicitly mentioning ``The package is...''. Perhaps the handbook should make it clear that submitting packages is not necessary since they are being rebuilt anyway (and FreeBSD.org now even has got a copy of Motif to rebuild these packages ;-). -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607300603.IAA09960>