Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:29:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Blue <Susan.Lan@zyxel.com.tw> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Critical section in in6_setsockaddr and in6_setpeeraddr Message-ID: <20060530092855.B98242@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <447C0DFF.8050500@zyxel.com.tw> References: <447C0DFF.8050500@zyxel.com.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Blue wrote: Hi, > In in6_setpeeraddr and in6_setsockaddr in in6_pcb.c, the critical section > still uses legacy splnet() and splx(). However, the splnet() and splx() have > been redefined as empty function. Don't we need to rewrite the part with > INP_LOCK(inp); .... INP_UNLOCK(inp);? that's what is in HEAD already. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060530092855.B98242>