From owner-cvs-ports Wed Jan 21 16:42:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA18064 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 16:42:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-ports) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA17929; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 16:41:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA01268; Thu, 22 Jan 1998 00:40:51 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id BAA04064; Thu, 22 Jan 1998 01:40:51 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <19980122014050.12156@follo.net> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 01:40:50 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund To: "David E. O'Brien" Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/nat - Imported sources References: <199801211137.DAA10007@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <199801211137.DAA10007@freefall.freebsd.org>; from David E. O'Brien on Wed, Jan 21, 1998 at 03:37:55AM -0800 Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jan 21, 1998 at 03:37:55AM -0800, David E. O'Brien wrote: > obrien 1998/01/21 03:37:55 PST > > ports/security/nat - Imported sources > Update of /home/ncvs/ports/security/nat > In directory freefall.freebsd.org:/d/users/obrien/new/nat > > Log Message: > NetBIOS Auditing Tool / Security Kit > Is importing this under the name 'nat' a good idea? I immediately associated this with Network Address Translation, at least, especially with the security context. Eivind.