Date: 12 Dec 1998 23:41:26 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, shmit@kublai.com, dima@best.net, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proposed diffs for /etc/rc.local (was Re: /etc/rc.local ) Message-ID: <xzpr9u5gezt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Matthew Dillon's message of "Sat, 12 Dec 1998 11:14:50 -0800 (PST)" References: <24130.913454380@zippy.cdrom.com> <199812121914.LAA46284@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> writes: > Here's an (untestd) proposal. I changed the ordering slightly, too, > updating motd prior to running /etc/rc.devfs to keep things neat. rc.local > now contains nothing substantial beyond comments. I recommend keeping > the rc.local in the CVS tree but not installing it in /etc if /etc > already has one. We don't have a nearly-empty rc.conf.local in the tree. There's no reason why we should have a nearly-empty rc.local there either. It's just an open invitation for committers to (wrongly) add code to it. Document it in rc(8), but leave it out of the tree. OBTW, rc.conf.local should be documented in rc.conf(5) instead of / in addition to rc(8). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpr9u5gezt.fsf>