From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 16:14:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F9F98EB; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cu01176b.smtpx.saremail.com (cu01176b.smtpx.saremail.com [195.16.151.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E41F2FAC; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.2] (izaro.sarenet.es [192.148.167.11]) by proxypop04.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 896A99DCAA7; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:07:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Borja Marcos Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Unusable Emulex "oce" driver version in -STABLE, 9.3 and CURRENT Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:07:45 +0200 Message-Id: <8D93EDF7-AC0E-4707-AC62-55CBD5F3358D@sarenet.es> To: Stable Stable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:14:32 -0000 Hello, This should be fixed before the release of 9.3, and of course as soon as = possible for the rest of the branches. At least under 10-STABLE the "oce" driver can cause a panic when there's = a lot of network traffic. I have been able to reproduce it using "iperf". Sometimes the panic can be triggered within seconds of = starting an iperf test. There's a new driver available for download on the Emulex site, version = 10.0.747.0, and it works perfectly. The source code compiles perfectly under FreeBSD 10-STABLE (at least recent versions since April) and the = kernel module loads without trouble. There's a bug report covering this but seems to be forgotten :/ https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D183391 Thanks! Borja.