From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 05:43:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179AE1065670 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@j.email.ne.jp) Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail1.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5808FC20 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@j.email.ne.jp) Received: from localhost (unknown [151.197.61.126]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAD556DF6; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:25:06 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:24:51 -0400 From: Yoshihiro Ota To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, vadim_nuclight@mail.ru Message-Id: <20080315012451.674530f4.ota@j.email.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <200803141508.m2EF86Jl068931@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200803141508.m2EF86Jl068931@lurza.secnetix.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru, Oliver Fromme Subject: Re: RELEASE discs & ISO images (for future) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:43:27 -0000 On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:08:06 +0100 (CET) Oliver Fromme wrote: > Vadim Goncharov wrote: > > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > The xorg packages on disc1 occupy 54 MB. Not really all > > > that much, I think. The linux base, perl and python occupy > > > another 50 MB together. The rest are small utility things > > > and dependencies (only a few MB). > > > > But that is still valuable if geom_ugz is in use. > > Have you actually tried it? Providing hard numbers is > more useful than just talking about it. :-) > > Here are some numbers: > > 224655360 7.0-RELEASE-i386-livefs.iso > 94493696 7.0-RELEASE-i386-livefs.iso.uzip (16k cluster) > 110188032 7.0-RELEASE-i386-livefs.iso.uzip (2K cluster) > > So the difference is 124 MB for 16K cluster size, and > 109 MB for 2K cluster size (which is noticably faster > during access). Actually the space savings will be a > bit less, because the /boot directory (about 30 MB) > won't be compressed. So the real gain is probably a > little less than 100 MB in the 2K case. By the way, the maxmum cluster size is 127k or 130048 with uzip, if you want to maximize the compression ratio. Hiro