From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 27 05:18:42 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA13982 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 05:18:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA13972 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 05:18:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.11 #1) id 105Uq3-000NT1-00; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:16:59 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Bruce Evans cc: bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr, dhw@whistle.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, meyerd1@fang.cs.sunyit.edu, mike@smith.net.au Subject: Re: NIS with HPUX 10.20 In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 27 Jan 1999 23:56:51 +1100." <199901271256.XAA21036@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:16:59 +0200 Message-ID: <90210.917443019@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 23:56:51 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > No. installworld more or less assumes single user. This is really what I'm getting at. :-) If installworld assumes single-user mode, why do we install -C ld-elf.so.1 ? The first time I asked this question, I didn't mention single-user mode and your answer was that it's to protect "live systems". What's so live about a single-user system that we can't assume nothing else needs ld-elf.so.1 while we're smacking it? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message