Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 21:26:47 +0000 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: des@ofug.org Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Checksum/copy Message-ID: <20030327212647.GA64029@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <xzp7kalw5j4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303260956250.27748-100000@root.org> <20030326225530.G2075@odysseus.silby.com> <20030327180247.D1825@gamplex.bde.org> <xzp7kalw5j4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 09:57:35AM +0100, des@ofug.org wrote:
> Might it be a good idea to have separate b{copy,zero} implementations
> for special purposes like pmap_{copy,zero}_page?
We do have a i686_pagezero already, which seems to be used in
pmap_zero_page - I guess it may not be well tuned to modern processors,
as it is almost 5 years old.
David.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030327212647.GA64029>