From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 10:10:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94BA16A401 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97AA913C4CC for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l2GAA9sk014738 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:10:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l2GAA9QC014737; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:10:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:10:09 GMT Message-Id: <200703161010.l2GAA9QC014737@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Szilveszter Adam Cc: Subject: Re: kern/110376: add some more explanations for the iwi/ipw firmware inclusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Szilveszter Adam List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:10:09 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/110376; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Szilveszter Adam To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/110376: add some more explanations for the iwi/ipw firmware inclusion Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:21:21 +0100 Hello, On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:09:18AM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Also, manual pages iwi(4) and ipw(4) are specifying that the > license kenv tunable is license.intel_.license_ack. Reading > the /sys/tools/fw_stub.awk I had a strong feeling that the right > name is license..license_ack as noted in the original commit > message and in the UPDATING. Well, I also had this feeling at first (especially since I tend to trust UPDATING in these matters) but it is not so. I know this because I have tried the variant you suggested first and found out fairly quickly that the firmware did not load. :-) This was on iwi, btw, but I do not think this matters. With the variant in the man page, it works 1A. I specify the var in /boot/loader.conf. And the var name starts with "legal" not "license" in both cases. Your first point about required kernel modules stands however :-) -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Budapest Hungary