Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 06:23:26 -0500 From: George Mitchell <george@m5p.com> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd/pandaboard Spurious interrupt detected [0x000003ff] Message-ID: <527783AE.1080303@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <CAHPQsEQQ%2BZ29vZj%2BasoWB3mFPo-wU%2BJJ7LytGJ=q8BmPSozd_w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAHPQsESP2aQxYDj0J=BdDUDhQdWnxMuAJ5fPNELGqLPsR==Ktg@mail.gmail.com> <1383526716.31172.131.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <CAHPQsEQQ%2BZ29vZj%2BasoWB3mFPo-wU%2BJJ7LytGJ=q8BmPSozd_w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/03/13 21:19, David Cheney wrote: > Thanks Ian, try now. > > As a question to the group, I have the following hardware > > Pandaboard > BeagleBone Black > RPi > > And I am trying to bring up Freebsd/arm so I can get our Go builder > working again[1]. Of these candidates, which is the one you would > recommend ? > > Cheers > > Dave > > [1] build.golang.org > [...] The RPi, please -- from a completely selfish point of view, since I have one on my desk that's waiting to be my CUPS print server. From a less selfish viewpoint, its low cost is bound to attract a larger number of users. (It already has sold 1.75 million units worldwide according to some sources.) But any work at all on FreeBSD/ARM is guaranteed to be beneficial to FreeBSD/s success going forward. Unless ARM becomes a Tier 1 platform for FreeBSD, we will end up getting left even further behind in operating system uptake than we already are. -- George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?527783AE.1080303>