Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:07:17 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Peek <mark@whistle.com> Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib strtol.3 strtol.c strtoll.c strtoq.c strtoul.3 strtoul.c strtoull.c strtouq.c Message-ID: <20010904140717.C98191@coffee.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <p0510030bb7babe912e8d@[10.1.10.118]>; from mark@whistle.com on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:36:52AM -0700 References: <200109041639.f84GdBm87501@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010904204454.A32114@nagual.pp.ru> <p05100307b7bab7186d08@[10.1.10.118]> <20010904211814.A32624@nagual.pp.ru> <p0510030bb7babe912e8d@[10.1.10.118]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Peek <mark@whistle.com> writes: > At 9:18 PM +0400 9/4/01, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:54:49 -0700, Mark Peek wrote: > > > >> Wow, less than 24 hours is considered "audit silence"? I'd like to > > > >No, actually 34 hours passed. > > Sorry, you're right. I forgot to verify the time zone offsets. > However, my comment still stands...what is the correct wait time to > assume "audit silence"? Even 34 hours seems way low to ascribe it to > "silence". I would say the minimum amount of time one would expect to wait for a review from -audit would be 3-5 days. Failing that, a request for review e-mailed directly to someone familiar with the code you're working on is appropriate. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010904140717.C98191>