From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Jan 15  0:19:17 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from spammie.svbug.com (unknown [198.79.110.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A05937B401
	for <bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:18:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spammie.svbug.com (localhost.mozie.org [127.0.0.1])
	by spammie.svbug.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA02492;
	Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:17:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jessem@spammie.svbug.com)
Message-Id: <200101150817.AAA02492@spammie.svbug.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:17:00 -0800 (PST)
From: opentrax@email.com
Reply-To: opentrax@email.com
Subject: Re: docs/24307: man page for inetd(8) missing /etc/protocols in FIL
  ES section
To: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie
Cc: olgeni@uli.it, bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <20010114222707.A44872@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org



On 14 Jan, David Malone wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 06:57:08PM -0800, opentrax@email.com wrote:
> 
> Sorry - I closed this PR accidently. I was going to point out that
> inetd doesn't use /etc/protocols, because it does not have to
> translate protocol names to protocol numbers. The tokens "tcp",
> "udp", ... used in inetd.conf are parsed by inetd as it has no
> need to know any protocol numbers.
> 
> If this seems OK, then I'll leave the PR closed.
> 
Can I get a commit on the documentation?
Even if is has no real use for inetd(8), it should
be documented becuase it's mentioned.
This provides consistent style. 

Commit and close would be the appropriate action.

				Jessem.





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message