Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 13:24:37 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@FreeBSD.ORG>, FreeBSD-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Support for bootable Vinum file systems: please review Message-ID: <12575.957698677@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 May 2000 20:29:44 %2B0930." <20000507202944.I55316@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20000507202944.I55316@freebie.lemis.com>, Greg Lehey writes: >>> >>> This is pretty much what struct devstat does, except that it's more >>> global. Why should we maintain two lists, just because one is >>> primarily intended for statistics? >>> >>> Anyway, I assume this isn't so much a criticism of the fix as of the >>> infrastructure around it. Correct? >> >> No, this is an objection to opening up devstat that way. > >Can you make an alternative suggestion? >>>> The right way to do it is probably to link the "struct disk"s >>>> registered by the drivers with disk_creat() into a list which can >>>> be searched. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12575.957698677>