From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Oct 20 16:15:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA27710 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 16:15:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat) Received: from babylon.wsc.monash.edu.au (babylon.wsc.monash.edu.au [130.194.166.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA27692 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 16:15:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from graeme@babylon.wsc.monash.edu.au) Received: from localhost (graeme@localhost) by babylon.wsc.monash.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA13061 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 09:14:41 +1000 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 09:14:40 +1000 (EST) From: Graeme Cross Reply-To: Graeme.Cross@sci.monash.edu.au To: "chat@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: Linux vs. the rest of the world, poor OS comparison on web p In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-Attribution: gjc X-No-Archive: yes X-No-Junk-Mail: Do not send me junk mail under any circumstances X-PGP-Key-ID: 702DB549 X-URI: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > On Sun, 19 Oct 1997, Amancio wrote: > > : it sort of reminded me of 386bsd. After I install the system, I went on > : to build a kernel -- interesting approach to config the kernel : > : make config which asks you a bunch of questions --- all of the sudden > : the Freebsd config file seem like a 21 first century super duper > : kernel configuation database 8) Linux kernel configuration the elegant way: make menuconfig make xconfig Complete with on-line explanations for every kernel compilation option. You can save multiple kernel configurations as well. This has been supported since the 1.2 kernels (IIRC). > : Slackware left me with the impression that it was too slanted to > : hackers and for the life of me I can't figure out why people > : prefer linux to Freebsd -- it seems that Freebsd will be easier > : on newbies. Linux/*BSD wars do not seem do to much to promote free software. If you really need to do a comparison, you have a choice of a handful of distributions: Redhat, Debian, Slackware, Caldera and SuSe. All of these, bar one, is a very professional distribution that is well maintained, has excellent mailing list support and is very elegant and simple to install. Which one is the exception? Slackware (IMHO). It has a very small user base these days, and is really beginning to show it's age. Which one seems to have been the basis of FreeBSD/Linux comparisons in these recent threads? Slackware. If you really feel the need to compare & contrast Linux and FreeBSD, comparing against Redhat or Debian would be a more useful comparison. My two cents worth, as a both a FreeBSD and Linux user. Cheers Graeme - -- Graeme Cross Water Studies Centre, Monash University http://www.wsc.monash.edu.au/~graeme/ Random thought #87 Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv Comment: Auto-signed by PPG (v1.01) (the PGP/PINE gateway) iQB1AwUBNEvlxmAiycRwLbVJAQEaAAMAvuGJka8B2y7yzEvSr8hIRRdFh19xz+LE iJ48BhqkW4QKhcieWpPUKVgLXfjZC8a4IlPHm9jeNxTKuFyMMpnqoUoeEb7v2L26 nbboihpggg2hfokY6X+zt/NQZwrbNKuW =/Xqi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----