Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 16:48:33 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru> To: Remko Lodder <remko@elvandar.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: permissions on /etc/namedb Message-ID: <20080804084833.GA35267@svzserv.kemerovo.su> In-Reply-To: <a64aff337658fe18eb43cf6f459641d1.squirrel@galain.elvandar.org> References: <20080803073803.GA10321@grosbein.pp.ru> <4895EB57.2000801@FreeBSD.org> <20080803183346.GA53252@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <4896997D.8060001@FreeBSD.org> <20080804060658.GA19639@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <4896A416.80602@FreeBSD.org> <20080804075510.GA28531@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <a64aff337658fe18eb43cf6f459641d1.squirrel@galain.elvandar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 10:44:59AM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: > I like the unwriteable /etc/namedb directory for bind, so that one is > "forced" to create directories for bind, which it has write access to. You > do not want to clobber the /etc/namedb directory with files (imo) ;) Should we change our default src/etc/namedb/named.conf in the Repository so that named won't warn about unwriteable "working directory"? Eugene Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080804084833.GA35267>